1. Do you believe, as McKibben suggests, that global warming is more dangerous than nuclear warfare? Why or why not?
2. What does the end of nature entail? Is mastering nature to benefit our own needs immoral? Why or why not?
3. Do you believe that the planet is significantly different than it used to be? Why or why not?
4. What is McKibben's underlying message about life, religion, and nature, and what literary and/or rhetorical devices does he use to convey this with? Support your answer with the text.
5. Do you feel that the structure of nature is caused more by natural disasters or by natural progression? And which one do you think could eventually have a major impact on the world first?